Eviction Moratorium Litigation: What Courts Said, and What Courts Missed
نویسندگان
چکیده
In 2020, federal, state, and local governments imposed eviction moratoriums to prevent mass homelessness limit the spread of COVID-19. Landlords responded this unprecedented action by filing lawsuits around country. This Article analyzes litigation. It examines claims landlords, defenses raised government, how courts dealt with each them. also highlights ways that misunderstand rental market devalue tenants. The shows that, before Supreme Court intervened in mid-2021, most landlord suits failed, either because rejected their or ran out clock, demonstrating can protect vulnerable times crisis.
منابع مشابه
"I did what?" Zolpidem and the courts.
Zolpidem is a widely prescribed nonbenzodiazepine hypnotic medication available in the United States since 1992. Attention has been drawn recently to its potential to cause sleep-related, complex behaviors such as sleepwalking and sleep driving. These automatic behaviors have led to a deluge of legal claims. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first review in the forensic literature of the l...
متن کاملWhat CanWe Say About Mental Health Courts Today ?
Mental health courts (MHCs) are a popular type of problem-solving court, and there is ample evidence that they reduce recidivism and increase participation in community-based treatment. The authors summarize evidence for the effectiveness of MHCs and present findings from a study in which they identified and characterized 346 adult and 51 juvenile MHCs currently operating in the United States. ...
متن کاملEditorial: promoting equity in health: what role for courts?
One of the most significant transformations to occur in the landscape of struggles for health justice since this journal was originally launched relates to the increasing judicialization of health-related rights, and economic, social, and cultural rights (ESC rights) more broadly. Indeed, the articles in this issue go far toward debunking outdated conceptions about health rights as merely "prog...
متن کاملShould Courts Always Enforce What Contracting Parties Write?∗
We find an economic rationale for the common sense answer to the question in our title — courts should not always enforce what the contracting parties write. We describe and analyze a contractual environment that allows a role for an active court. An active court can improve on the outcome that the parties would achieve without it. The institutional role of the court is to maximize the parties’...
متن کاملMeasuring what Matters in Specialist Domestic Violence Courts
Using data from seven specialist domestic violence courts (SDVCs) in England and Wales, it is argued that these relatively new institutions need to reorient themselves away from typical criminal justice performance measures (such as arrests, prosecutions and convictions) and towards measuring what matters to the service users themselves (in this case, victims of domestic violence). Analysis of ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Social Science Research Network
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1556-5068']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3920387